Page 24 - 期货和衍生品行业监管动态(2023年4月)
P. 24

期货和衍生品行业监管动态




                   failed to communicate to clients in a fair and balanced manner based on principles of

                   fair dealing and good faith, in violation of Regulation 23.433.


                        Goldman admits that for nearly all “same-day” swaps executed in 2015 and 2016,

                   it either failed to disclose any PTMMM or failed to disclose an accurate PTMMM, and

                   that this conduct violated a CFTC regulation.

                        The order imposes a $15,000,000 civil monetary penalty.


                        “The  purpose  of  the  CFTC’s  Business  Conduct  Standards  is  to  promote

                   transparency and fairness in the swaps market. The CFTC is committed to ensuring that

                   swap dealers abide by these standards, so that swap counterparties receive disclosures

                   allowing them to assess material aspects of the swaps before entering into them. As

                   today’s  penalty  against  Goldman  demonstrates,  the  CFTC  will  aggressively  pursue

                   swap  dealers  that  violate  these  business  conduct  standards,”  said  Director  of

                   Enforcement Ian P. McGinley.


                        Case Background


                        The order finds that in 2015 and 2016, Goldman transacted dozens of “same-day”

                   equity index swaps with U.S.-based clients. In a “same-day” equity index swap, the

                   equity leg of the swap strikes on the “same day” as the other material terms of the swap
                   are agreed upon, rather than—as is typical—the day after the date of agreement. The


                   order finds that Goldman failed to disclose to clients the PTMMM of these swaps—
                   often disclosing a PTMMM for a different swap (the analogous “T+1” swap) instead,

                   thereby obscuring the value of the same-day swap.


                        The order finds that Goldman opportunistically solicited or agreed to enter into

                   same-day  swaps  only  on  days  and  at  times  that  were  financially  advantageous  to

                   Goldman and disadvantageous to its clients. Moreover, the manner in which Goldman

                   communicated  to  clients  caused  the  same-day  swaps  to  appear  more  economically

                   advantageous to the clients than they actually were. As found in the order, in certain

                   instances, Goldman disclosed a PTMMM for the “T+1” swap and then bid over it for


                                                            13
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29