Page 26 - 期货和衍生品行业监管动态(2023年8月刊)
P. 26

期货和衍生品行业监管动态




                        The  order  requires  Bryant  and  Bryant  Capital  to  pay,  jointly  and  severally,

                   $55,655.90 in restitution and a $195,000 civil monetary penalty, and to cease and desist

                   from  any  further  violations  of  the  Commodity  Exchange  Act  (CEA)  and  CFTC

                   regulations, as charged. In addition, the order imposes four-year trading and registration

                   bans on Bryant and Bryant Capital.


                        Case Background


                        According to the order, beginning approximately February 2014 and continuing

                   through  approximately  December  2022,  Bryant  and  Bryant  Capital  acted  as

                   unregistered CTAs through direct outreach, electronic communications, newsletters,

                   and web-based advertisements. Such solicitations offered advice regarding the value

                   and  advisability  of  trading  in  commodity  options,  futures,  and/or  swaps  in  energy

                   markets and promoted respondents’ paid trading advisory services.



                        According to the order, these solicitations included numerous false and misleading
                   statements regarding their business and performance, their expertise and experience in


                   the  energy  derivatives  markets,  client  base,  past  performance,  as  well  as  the

                   applicability of the CFTC’s registration requirements to their business. For example, in

                   one newsletter, respondents falsely represented that in 2021, they provided services to

                   47 clients with “proprietary - detailed analyses and made countless recommendations,”

                   and that in 44 of these 47 analyses, their work had “identified performance markers

                   resulting  in  a  27%-39%  reduction  in  2021  energy  costs  (the  proper  term  here  is

                   ‘avoidance  of  increased  costs’)  in  addition  to  showing  a  minimum  5%  immediate

                   reduction in current energy costs within the first 90 days of engagement.”


                        To  the  contrary,  as  found  in  the  order,  these  representations  were  entirely

                   fabricated. The respondents also falsely represented their business was operating as an

                   “exempt swap intermediary” that did not require CFTC registration.







                                                             12
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31