Page 23 - 期货和衍生品行业监管动态(2023年8月刊)
P. 23

期货和衍生品行业监管动态




                   CFTC’s recordkeeping and supervision requirements involving the use of unapproved

                   communication  methods,”  said  Director  of  Enforcement  Ian  McGinley.  “The

                   Commission’s  message  could  not  be  more  clear—recordkeeping  and  supervision

                   requirements  are  fundamental,  and  registrants  that  fail  to  comply  with  these  core

                   regulatory obligations do so at their own peril.”


                        Each order finds the swap dealer and/or FCM in question, for a period of years,

                   failed to stop its employees, including those at senior levels, from communicating both

                   internally  and  externally  using  unapproved  communication  methods,  including

                   messages sent via personal text or WhatsApp. The firms were required to keep certain

                   of these written communications because they related to the firms’ businesses as CFTC

                   registrants.  These  written  communications  generally  were  not  maintained  and

                   preserved by the firms, and the firms generally would not have been able to provide

                   them promptly to the CFTC when requested.



                        Each  order  further  finds  the  widespread  use  of  unapproved  communication
                   methods  violated  the  swap  dealers’  and/or  FCMs’  internal  policies  and  procedures,


                   which  generally  prohibited  business-related  communication  taking  place  via

                   unapproved methods. Further, some of the same supervisory personnel responsible for

                   ensuring  compliance  with  the  firms’  policies  and  procedures  themselves  used  non-

                   approved methods of communication to engage in business-related communications, in

                   violation of firm policy.


                        Case Background


                        The  orders  find,  as  a  result  of  each  registrant’s  failure  to  ensure  that  its

                   employees—including  supervisors  and  senior-level  employees—complied  with

                   communications policies and procedures, each registrant failed to maintain hundreds if

                   not  thousands  of  business-related  communications,  including  communications  in

                   connection with its commodities and swaps businesses, and thus failed diligently to




                                                              9
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28