Page 308 - 《期货和衍生品行业监管动态》(2022年合集)
P. 308

期货和衍生品行业监管动态




                   Dohme are also charged with failing to register Powerline as a Commodity Trading
                   Advisor (CTA) and for failure to make required disclosures.


                        The order imposes a $375,000 civil monetary penalty and $500,000 in

                   disgorgement, with Dohme and Wright’s monetary obligation capped at $150,000

                   each. The order also imposes six-month trading and three-month registration bans on

                   Powerline, Dohme, and Wright.


                        “We are committed to ensuring that market participants are honestly served by

                   intermediaries and advisors, and that those intermediaries and advisors provide all the

                   transparency that our statutes and regulations require,” said CFTC Acting Director of

                   Enforcement Gretchen Lowe. “Further, as this case shows, we will not tolerate false

                   and misleading statements being made to our exchanges.”


                        Case Background

                        The order finds that Powerline, Dohme, and Wright defrauded clients by failing

                   to adequately disclose that Powerline acted as the counterparty to its clients’

                   transactions—not merely as a broker. The order also finds that Powerline, Dohme,

                   and Wright failed to disclose that Powerline charged clients a markup over the cost at

                   which Powerline was able to acquire the fuel hedging strategies in the market. These

                   failures also violated Powerline’s obligation to disclose to clients all fees and conflicts

                   of interest. In addition, the order finds Dohme liable as a controlling person for

                   Powerline’s violations.


                        Moreover, according to the order, Dohme and Wright produced a backdated

                   letter to CME, to give CME the false impression that a certain disclosure was made to

                   clients before it actually had been.


                        The order also finds that Powerline acted as a CTA by offering clients fuel

                   hedging strategies, but failed to register as such.










                                                             262
                   回 到 首 页                                                                     回 到 目 录
   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313