Page 32 - 期货和衍生品行业监管动态(2026年2月)
P. 32

期货和衍生品行业监管动态




                            compliance team contacted the candidate that same day, and the trader

                            acknowledged that he knew these trades were improper and violated Kalshi’s

                            rules, which prohibit trading in a contract over which the trader has direct or

                            indirect influence over the outcome. Kalshi imposed a $2,246.36 financial

                            penalty (disgorgement of $246.36 related to the improper trading activity,

                            plus a $2,000.00 penalty) and a 5-year suspension from direct or indirect

                            access to the exchange. Based on this fact pattern, the trader potentially

                            violated Section 6(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (Act), and

                            Commission Regulation (Regulation) 180.1(a)(1) and (3) for use of a

                            manipulative scheme or artifice to defraud, or engaging or attempting to

                            engage in an act, practice or course of business that operates as a fraud on

                            any other person.


                           In August and September 2025, an individual traded a prediction market

                            related to a YouTube channel while having an employment relationship or

                            other formal affiliation with the subject of the contract, through which the

                            trader likely had access to material non-public information related to his

                            trades, in violation of exchange rules. Upon investigating the highly

                            successful trades and the trader responsible, Kalshi discovered that the trader


                            was an editor for a YouTube channel who likely had advanced knowledge of

                            the contents of the channel’s videos prior to the time they were publicly

                            posted. Kalshi concluded there was reasonable belief that the trades were

                            based on material non-public information misappropriated in violation of a

                            pre-existing duty and imposed a $20,397.58 financial penalty (disgorgement

                            of $5,397.58 in profits from the illicit trading, plus a $15,000.00 penalty) and

                            a 2-year suspension from direct or indirect access to the exchange. Based on

                            this  fact  pattern,  the  trader  potentially  violated  prohibitions  on

                            misappropriation of confidential information in breach of a pre-existing duty

                            of trust and confidence to the source of the information (commonly known as



                                                              22
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37